Position in chronology
MS 3010
About this tablet
This is one of the oldest administrative records in human history, dating to the Uruk period (roughly 3300–3000 BCE) — the era when writing was first invented in southern Mesopotamia. It is a small lenticular (lens-shaped) stone tablet, inscribed with proto-cuneiform signs that list quantities of commodities — probably foodstuffs and possibly personnel — under institutional management. Objects like this were produced by the world's first bureaucracies, attached to large temple or palace complexes, to track the flow of goods. The signs are still pictographic rather than fully abstract, making this a witness to writing at its very birth.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
The tablet records a short list of quantities against commodity or category labels: one woman (or female worker); six units of some interior/stomach-related product; two portions of a bread or food ration; one unit of a mountain-origin commodity with an uncertain large-number classifier; nine units of something now too damaged to read; one unit of a released or processed commodity; and finally one large-order unit linked to what appears to be a household, a prominent individual, or an institutional complex. Much of the precise meaning is lost to damaged signs and the still-imperfect decipherment of proto-cuneiform, but the overall structure is clearly a standard Uruk-period ration or commodity account.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine1 [unit] — woman (SAL) 6 [units] — stomach/interior (ŠA3) 2 [units] — [type of] bread/food ration (|NINDA2×X|) 1 [unit] — mountain / [commodity with] |U4×1(N57)| (KUR |U4×1(N57)|) 9 [units] — [damaged; commodity/sign uncertain] (X X) 1 [unit] — [released/processed commodity?] (|DU8×HI|?) 1 N14 [large unit] — [institution or household?] KIŠ HI E2 NUN GIR A
Our translation engine — Sonnet 4.6. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Engine notes
read from photo7 uncertain terms ↓
- SAL — Proto-cuneiform sign for 'woman' or 'female'; could also denote a female worker category in ration lists. Reading is relatively secure if sign is intact.
- SZA3~a1 — Conventionally read as 'heart, interior'; in administrative contexts may denote an internal storage unit or commodity type. The tilde notation indicates a sign variant.
- |NINDA2xX|# — NINDA2 is the bread/food sign; the 'X' inside is partially damaged (#), making the specific compound uncertain. Likely a food ration commodity.
- KUR~a |U4x1(N57)| — KUR = mountain/foreign land; U4 = sun/day/time. The compound may denote a foreign origin marker combined with a time or date notation, but proto-cuneiform compound interpretations remain contested.
- |DU8~cxHI|? — DU8 relates to opening/releasing; the compound with HI is uncertain (hence the ? in transliteration). May denote a type of distributed or processed commodity.
- KISZ HI E2~b NUN~a GIR~a A — This multi-sign sequence in the final line is complex. KISZ may refer to Kiš (the city) or a title; NUN~a can mean 'prince' or 'great'; GIR~a means 'foot/leg/way'; A means 'water'. Whether this is a personal name, an institutional name, or a list of separate commodity entries is unclear. Proto-cuneiform sign sequences at this period are often ambiguous between proper names and commodity terms.
- 1(N14) — N14 is a higher-order numerical sign in the proto-cuneiform system, representing a larger unit than N01. Its exact value depends on the commodity being counted (different metrological systems were used for different goods).
Reasoning ↓
The photograph shows two faces of a small, lenticular (lens-shaped) stone or clay object — this oval, biconvex form is characteristic of early Uruk-period administrative tokens or tablets. The surface has a vertical dividing line visible on both faces, consistent with columnar layout in proto-cuneiform accounting. On the upper face (obverse), I can make out stacked horizontal wedges on the left side that correspond to the N01 numerical notations in the transliteration, and what appear to be the SAL and ŠA3~a signs in the right column, though a large area of surface damage (reddish-brown discoloration and spalling) obscures the central and right portions. On the lower face (reverse), signs are better preserved: I can discern what looks like a diamond/lozenge shape (possibly KUR or a related sign), stacked wedges (numerical signs), a small drilled circular hole (possibly intentional perforation or damage), and at the bottom a more complex sign cluster consistent with the multi-sign sequence GIR~a and A. The transliteration's final line — a complex string of signs — is the most difficult to verify; the right side of the reverse is partly covered by mineral accretion. The N14 sign (a larger numerical unit, perhaps a '10' or higher-order value) in the final line is plausible given the context but cannot be confirmed from this photograph. The reading |DU8~cxHI|? with the uncertainty marker in the transliteration is appropriate; I cannot verify that compound sign. Overall, the photo broadly supports the transliteration but the damage means several signs remain unverifiable.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 12, 2026 · 3511 in / 1259 out tokens
Transliteration
1(N01) , SAL 6(N01) , SZA3~a1 2(N01) , |NINDA2xX|# 1(N01) , KUR~a |U4x1(N57)| 9(N01)# , X X 1(N01) , |DU8~cxHI|? 1(N14) , KISZ HI E2~b NUN~a GIR~a A
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Uruk IV (ca. 3350-3200 BC) ?) — MS 3010. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Schøyen Collection, Oslo, Norway (P006264) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-4-6 (2026-05-18/v5-modern-rendering).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.