Position in chronology
MS 3009
About this tablet
This small, lens-shaped clay tablet (MS 3009 in the Schøyen Collection) dates to the Uruk period, roughly 3300–3000 BCE, making it among the earliest written documents in human history. It is an administrative accounting record — a tally of commodities or rations allocated to named categories of officials or institutional personnel, including a figure called EN (the lord or high priest) and SANGA (an administrative priest), alongside quantities of workers (ERIN) and various unidentified goods. The obverse is well-preserved with clear circular and wedge impressions organized into a ruled grid, while the reverse is severely damaged by surface crystallization and is largely unreadable. Tablets like this one are the very foundation of writing itself: the script was invented not for literature or religion, but for keeping track of goods in large temple economies.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
The tablet records several batches of commodities or allocations: 20 units of a plant product; 34 units of an unidentified commodity for the EN (the lord or chief administrator); 20 units associated with Uruk itself. Then: 20 units to a head official in the IB category; 32 units of workers or labor personnel; 30 units of NUNUZ (perhaps eggs or seed grain). The final line — the most heavily damaged — records a larger quantity (combining two higher-order numerical signs to give roughly 36-plus units) of something described as great (GAL), belonging to the SANGA priest-administrator and the EN-official; the rest is broken away.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine20 [units], DIN-plant/herb 34 [units], ZATU842-commodity, EN (lord/high-official) 20 [units], UNUG (Uruk) [blank / total line?] 20 [units], SAG (head/chief?), IB 32 [units], ERIN (workers/troops) 30 [units], NUNUZ (eggs/seed?) 2(N34) 36 [units], KISZ, GAL (great), SANGA (administrator/priest), EN (lord/high-official) [...]
Our translation engine — Sonnet 4.6. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Engine notes
read from photo9 uncertain terms ↓
- ZATU842 — A rare or unidentified archaic pictograph catalogued in the ZATU sign list; its commodity referent is unknown or disputed. Cannot verify from photo.
- EN~a — The archaic sign for EN, conventionally interpreted as a high-status office-holder, lord, or high priest of an institution; exact semantic force in this administrative context debated.
- UNUG~a — The archaic sign for Uruk (the city); here possibly denoting origin of goods, institutional affiliation, or a toponym used as category label.
- DIN — Archaic sign often associated with plant/herbal products or a specific commodity class; exact referent uncertain.
- IB~a — Sign whose precise commodity or personnel referent in the archaic corpus is not securely established; associated with SAG ('head') here, possibly indicating a category of person.
- ERIN — Conventionally read as 'troops' or 'workers/labor force'; in archaic texts the precise institutional meaning is debated.
- NUNUZ~a2 — Literally depicts a round object or egg; may refer to eggs, seed, or a specific commodity class. The exact referent is uncertain.
- KISZ GAL~a SANGA~a EN~a — This line on the reverse is heavily damaged and mineral-encrusted in the photo; SANGA is conventionally rendered 'chief administrator' or 'temple administrator'; readings marked # and ? in the transliteration indicate the excavator's own uncertainty. Cannot verify from photo.
- N14, N01, N34 — Archaic numerical signs: N14 is a large circular impression (value ~10 in certain commodity contexts), N01 is a small circular impression (value 1), N34 is a large impressed circle of different type. Values vary by commodity context in the archaic sexagesimal/bisexagesimal systems.
Reasoning ↓
Visual examination of the obverse (upper central image) shows a well-preserved small lenticular clay tablet divided into ruled cells by incised lines. The obverse displays clearly legible circular/semi-circular impressed numerals (the archaic N14 and N01 notation) in the left columns of each cell, alongside pictographic signs in the right columns. I can confirm numerals in multiple cells — groups of large circular impressions (N14 = ~10 units) and smaller ones (N01 = 1 unit) — consistent with the transliteration's numerical notations. The pictographic signs are harder to resolve at this resolution: I can see what appears to be a plant/herb sign (U2~b), a head sign (SAG), and signs consistent with ERIN and NUNUZ in their archaic pictographic forms. The sign ZATU842 is not independently verifiable from the photo at this resolution. The reverse (lower image) is heavily encrusted with mineral deposits (calcite crystallisation) and the signs there are almost entirely obscured — the transliteration's final line with KISZ, GAL, SANGA, EN cannot be verified from the photo. The edge views show the typical lenticular profile of an archaic Uruk tablet. Overall the photo broadly supports the transliteration's structure of numerical + commodity entries, but precise sign identification for the rarer signs (ZATU842, KISZ, SANGA) cannot be confirmed. The sign readings follow the CDLI/ZATU sign list conventions for the archaic Uruk corpus; N14 = large circular impression (~10), N01 = small circular impression (1), N34 = large impressed quantity marker.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 12, 2026 · 3462 in / 1217 out tokens
Transliteration
2(N14) , U2~b DIN 3(N14) 4(N01) , ZATU842 EN~a 2(N14) , UNUG~a , 2(N14) , SAG IB~a 3(N14) 2(N01) , ERIN 3(N14) , NUNUZ~a2 2(N34) 3(N14) 6(N01) , KISZ GAL~a# SANGA~a# EN~a#? [...]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Uruk IV (ca. 3350-3200 BC) ?) — MS 3009. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Schøyen Collection, Oslo, Norway (P006263) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-4-6 (2026-05-18/v5-modern-rendering).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.