Sumerian·Book

Position in chronology

MSVO 1, 231

~3100 BCE·Uruk Period·P005298

About this tablet

This is a small administrative tablet from the Uruk/Jemdet Nasr period (roughly 3100–2900 BCE), among the very earliest writing on earth, recording quantities — likely of grain or personnel — under a series of headings or titles. It comes from Jemdet Nasr in southern Mesopotamia and belongs to the earliest bureaucratic record-keeping tradition, when scribes used simple numeral notations alongside proto-signs for officials, commodities, and categories of workers. The tablet is badly broken, so only fragments of each line survive, but the structure — numbers followed by sign groups — is typical of early institutional accounting.

Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.

Written in modern English

This broken clay tablet is an early accounting record. It lists a series of quantities — the number '2' appears twice, and '1' once — each paired with a sign or short label that seems to denote an official, a commodity category, or a type of worker. The first entry pairs a quantity with something called NAM2, followed by an entry marked PAP. Later lines mention a 'SZU' element with a dagger-shaped sign (SZITA), an entry involving a title 'EN' and the word for 'head' (SAG), another SZU entry, and a final entry with the sign BU. The tablet breaks off before and after nearly every line, so the overall transaction it recorded cannot be reconstructed.

A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.

Translation — our engine

Our engine
Low confidence
(Column/line 1) [...] 2(N01) , NAM2 [...] 2(N01) , PAP [...] , [illegible sign] SZU SZITA (dagger-sign) [...] 1(N01) , EN [illegible] SAG 2(N01) [...] , SZU [...] 2(N01) , BU [illegible] [...] , [...]

Our translation engine — Sonnet 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.

Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.

Engine notes

read from photo
8 uncertain terms
  • NAM2#Marked uncertain in transliteration; in proto-cuneiform administrative context may be a title element or determinative rather than 'fate/destiny'; cannot verify from photo.
  • PAP~aPossibly 'elder', 'ancestor', or a supervisory title; meaning in Uruk-period administration is debated.
  • SZUPossibly the hand/receive sign (later Sumerian ŠU, 'hand'); administrative meaning here unclear — could denote receipt or a personal name element.
  • SZITA@g~aGraphemic variant of the mace/weapon sign; @g marks a specific sub-type; whether this denotes an actual weapon, a ceremonial object, or functions as a determinative is uncertain.
  • EN~a#Archaic EN sign; likely denotes a high-status institutional role (lord, high priest) but the # signals editorial uncertainty in the reading itself.
  • SAG#Later 'head/person'; in administrative contexts can mark a total or personnel count, but the # indicates the sign reading here is uncertain.
  • BU~a#?Both the sign identity (~a variant) and reading are doubted by the editor (#?); no established administrative meaning confirmed for this period.
  • XUsed throughout the transliteration to mark signs that could not be identified by the editor; cannot verify from photo.
Reasoning ↓

The photograph shows a broken clay tablet fragment displayed from multiple angles (obverse, reverse, edges, and top). The obverse face (centre image) is the most legible: horizontal ruling lines dividing the surface into registers are clearly visible, consistent with proto-cuneiform administrative tablets of the Uruk/Jemdet Nasr period. Within the registers I can make out impressed circular (round) signs — consistent with the N01 numerals noted in the transliteration — and several incised angular signs in what appear to be the left and right columns of each register. The sign forms are very worn and the lower portion of the obverse is heavily abraded or missing. The reverse (bottom large image) is essentially blank or too eroded to read any signs. I can broadly confirm the presence of multi-column register layout and numerical impressions consistent with the transliteration's N01 counts, but individual sign identifications such as NAM2, PAP~a, EN~a, SZITA@g~a, BU~a cannot be confirmed at this resolution and preservation state. The transliteration is provided by CDLI editors and is taken as the authoritative reading; the photo corroborates the general tablet format but cannot resolve the many uncertain signs marked with # in the transliteration. This is a transliteration-supported reading with limited visual confirmation.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 15, 2026 · 2186 in / 992 out tokens

Transliteration

[...] 2(N01) , NAM2# [...]
2(N01)# , PAP~a
[...] , X SZU SZITA@g~a
[...] 1(N01)# , EN~a# X SAG#
2(N01)# [...] , SZU# [...]
2(N01) , BU~a#? X [...]
, [...]

Scholarly note

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Uruk III (ca. 3200-3000 BC)) — MSVO 1, 231. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

Attribution

Image: Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, UK (P005298) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).

Related tablets

Related sources