Position in chronology
CUSAS 01, 162
About this tablet
This is a fragmentary proto-cuneiform administrative tablet from the Uruk period (roughly the later fourth millennium BCE), among the very earliest writing known. It is a numerical account — rows of impressed number-signs each paired with a pictographic sign standing for a commodity, person, or institutional category (possibly beer, plant produce, personnel grades such as 'small,' 'woman,' or 'lord,' and an implement sign). Texts like this record the movement or allocation of goods and labor in an early city bureaucracy, long before the Sumerian language can be read from the signs with certainty — at this stage we are largely identifying sign-shapes and their conventional (often debated) values rather than translating connected sentences.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
This looks like an old ledger page, badly broken. At the top a quantity is missing, followed by a category marked 'HAL.' The next line records 1 unit (a large number-sign) of beer, next to a special combined symbol and the sign 'MU.' Below that, 2 units of some plant or reed product tied to a mound or threshing-floor sign. Then 3 units connected to signs for 'day/sun,' 'woman,' and 'HAL' together. Next, 2 units tied to a 'small/junior' category and 'woman' again. Then 2 units next to the sign for 'lord' paired with another compound symbol. After that, a larger count (2 plus 5 units) next to a dagger-shaped implement sign and an unclear following sign. Then a big count (5 plus 1 of a different, larger counting unit) next to the sign for 'large/great.' One more unit is recorded, then the tablet breaks off, and the rest — including whatever followed on the reverse — is lost.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine(Obverse) [...], HAL 1(N30~a), KASZ~b [compound sign ZATU714×HI@g~a] MU 2(N01), U2~a DU6~b 3(N01), U4 SAL HAL 2(N14), TUR HAL# SAL 2(N01), EN~a TU~b [compound sign GISZ×SZU2~a] 2(N14) 5(N01), SZITA~a1 NAMESZDA X 5(N01) 1(N57), GAL~a 1(N01), [...] [...], [...] (remainder broken/illegible)
Our translation engine — Sonnet 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo10 uncertain terms ↓
- HAL — Proto-cuneiform HAL: conventionally read as related to division/apportionment of goods, but precise administrative function in Uruk period remains debated; could also function as a personal name element.
- KASZ~b |ZATU714xHI@g~a| — The combined sign group is interpreted as a type of beer or beer-related commodity/vessel; the exact product and measure are uncertain.
- U2~a — Typically read as 'plant' or 'herb/fodder'; exact commodity unclear in this context.
- DU6~b — Read as 'mound' or 'ruin-mound' (tell); its precise administrative meaning in this context is uncertain — may be a toponym or determinative.
- TU~b — Sign function in this context is unclear; may relate to 'to enter/bring' or be part of a compound sign group.
- |GIŠxŠU2~a| — A compound sign; reading and meaning in this administrative context are uncertain and cannot be verified from the photo.
- ŠITA~a1 — Conventionally read as a type of cultic vessel or libation object; exact referent debated.
- NAMEŠDA — Sign reading tentative; possible title or category of personnel/goods; meaning in Uruk period context is not firmly established.
- MU — In Uruk period texts MU can denote 'name', 'year', or function as a determinative; precise role here is unclear.
- GAL~a — Read as 'great/large'; may modify a preceding quantity or denote a high-status category, but context is lost due to fragmentation.
Reasoning ↓
The photograph shows a fragmentary clay tablet broken into several pieces (the main inscribed face is the central piece, labeled CUNES 50-11-068 on a side fragment). The surface is heavily eroded and pitted, with at least one perforation/hole through the tablet face visible in the upper-central area. Cuneiform impressions are visible in roughly seven to eight ruled or divided registers on the main face, with round numerical impressions (N01 and N14 types) clearly discernible alongside angular sign-impressions, though resolution and erosion make precise sign identification difficult in several lines. Signs that can broadly be confirmed from the photo include what appear to be circular/round numerical impressions consistent with N01 and N14, and diagonal/angular strokes consistent with proto-cuneiform signs; the HAL, SAL, and EN~a signs are plausible from the transliteration but cannot be individually verified with certainty from this photo. The reverse (bottom large fragment in photo) appears largely blank or too eroded to read. The transliteration's note of HAL (apportionment), SAL (woman/female worker), TUR (child/junior), and EN~a (high official) aligns with typical Uruk-period ration and distribution tablet formats. The sign glossed as |GIŠxŠU2~a| and the X in line 7 cannot be verified from the photo. This is a transliteration-assisted reading; photo confirms general layout and numerical sign types but not individual lexical signs with high confidence.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 14, 2026 · 2121 in / 1203 out tokens
Transliteration
[...] , HAL 1(N30~a) , KASZ~b |ZATU714xHI@g~a| MU 2(N01) , U2~a DU6~b 3(N01) , U4 SAL HAL 2(N14) , TUR HAL# SAL 2(N01) , EN~a TU~b |GISZxSZU2~a| 2(N14) 5(N01) , SZITA~a1 NAMESZDA X 5(N01) 1(N57) , GAL~a 1(N01) , [...] [...] , [...]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Uruk III (ca. 3200-3000 BC)) — CUSAS 01, 162. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Department of Near Eastern Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA (P325250) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
A window into the world's first total state. The Ur III administration tracked every animal, every worker, every shekel — for a population in the millions. The level of paperwork was not exceeded until the modern era.