Position in chronology
MDP 06, 386
About this tablet
A proto-Elamite administrative tablet from Susa (southwestern Iran), dating to roughly 3100–2900 BCE — among the earliest writing systems ever used. The tablet records quantities of commodities or livestock against a series of category signs whose exact meanings remain undeciphered, as proto-Elamite script has never been fully read. It is a bookkeeping document: someone was tracking and tallying goods, almost certainly for a large institution such as a temple or palace storehouse. Its survival in fragments gives us a rare, if still opaque, window into the economic bureaucracy of one of the ancient world's earliest cities.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
This tablet opens with a heading or category label whose meaning is still unknown. It then lists several categories of goods or animals — their exact identities unreadable in proto-Elamite — each followed by a quantity: one category totals 3 units, another registers a larger combined count of two different size-units, several entries record 5 units each, and the final legible lines record entries of 3, 3, and 2 units respectively. Some entries are too damaged or broken to read. The overall document reads like an inventory or allocation list, with quantities carefully impressed beside each item category.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine[Heading/rubric: M157~a] M249~n, |M195+M038|, M145~n — 3 [...], [...] 2(large unit) 1(medium unit) M206~j — 5(N34) M206~i — [...] M128~e — 5(N34) M458~a — 5(N34) M128~e — [...] M039~c — 3 M039~e — 3 M032 — 2 [...] — 2
Our translation engine — Sonnet 4.6. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Engine notes
read from photo9 uncertain terms ↓
- M157~a — Heading or category sign of uncertain meaning; its institutional referent at Susa is not established. May denote a commodity type, a sub-institution, or a heading category.
- |M195+M038| — Compound (ligature) sign; the meaning of this combination is not securely identified in the proto-cuneiform corpus, especially at Susa where sign values may diverge from Uruk usage.
- N39B — An elongated impressed numeral of disputed value; may represent a large area or capacity unit depending on the counting system in use for the commodity in question.
- N24 — Medium-order numerical sign; its quantitative value is commodity- and system-dependent and cannot be converted to a modern equivalent without fuller context.
- N34 — High-order impressed numeral; exact value depends on the metrological sub-system (e.g., grain capacity, livestock tally, or area measure). Possibly represents a large round number (e.g., 10 or 60 of a lower unit).
- M206~j / M206~i — Variant forms of sign M206; distinction between ~j and ~i sub-variants may indicate different commodities or sub-categories, but the referents are not firmly established.
- M128~e — Possibly related to a specific commodity or institutional category at Susa; the ~e variant is attested but its meaning in the Susa corpus is debated.
- M458~a — Sign with uncertain commodity reference; appears in proto-cuneiform lists but its semantic value at Susa specifically is not resolved.
- M039~c / M039~e# — The # mark on M039~e# indicates the reading is uncertain/damaged. M039 variants appear in proto-cuneiform lists; their specific referents here are unclear. The ~e# reading is particularly tentative.
Reasoning ↓
Visually examining the upper fragment (obverse, labeled Sb 15208): the tablet is heavily cracked and reassembled from multiple sherds. The surface is badly abraded in the lower half, but on the upper-left face a cluster of impressed and incised proto-cuneiform signs is visible. I can make out what appear to be complex ligature signs (consistent with the compound signs like |M195+M038| noted in the transliteration), numerical impressed strokes in groups (consistent with N01-type numerals), and at least one sign that could be M206 or a similar rounded impressed form. The right side of the upper fragment shows a column of vertical impressed strokes consistent with a series of N34 or N01 numerals arranged in a list. The lower fragment (reverse or a second face) is far more damaged — surface is heavily spalled and eroded, with only faint traces of incised lines visible; I cannot read any signs there with confidence. The photo broadly aligns with the scholar-provided transliteration in showing a multi-entry list format with signs and numerical notations, but the resolution and damage prevent sign-by-sign confirmation. The sign identifications (M157, M249, M206, M128, M039, M032, M458) use the Protocuneiform Sign List notation; none of these map cleanly to established Sumerian or Akkadian words at this early stage, and their commodity referents at Susa remain contested in the literature on proto-Elamite and proto-cuneiform archives.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 15, 2026 · 2056 in / 1316 out tokens
Transliteration
M157~a , M249~n |M195+M038| M145~n , 3(N01) x , [...] 2(N39B) 1(N24) M206~j , 5(N34) M206~i , [...] M128~e , 5(N34) M458~a , 5(N34) M128~e , [...] M039~c , 3(N01) M039~e# , 3(N01) M032 , 2(N01) [...] , 2(N01)
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Proto-Elamite (ca. 3100-2900 BC)) — MDP 06, 386. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Louvre Museum, Paris, France (P008166) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-4-6 (2026-05-28/v6-glossary-aware).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.