Position in chronology
MDP 17, 446
About this tablet
A small accounting tablet from Susa in southwestern Iran, written around 3100–2900 BCE in proto-Elamite — one of the world's earliest writing systems and one that remains undeciphered. It is a ledger: an opening rubric, then several entries, each pairing a cluster of signs (probably naming goods, people, or offices) with a tally — twos and ones in the basic counting unit. We can read the arithmetic but not the words, which is precisely what makes tablets like this both tantalizing and important: they preserve the bookkeeping of a literate administration whose language is still locked away.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
This is a short administrative account. It opens with a header marking the document type, then lists entries: one item or party is credited with 2 units; the next with 1; another with 1; one entry is too damaged to read at all; then another single unit; then 2 more units after a gap. The tablet closes with a final sign pair — likely a summary note or the responsible party. Because proto-Elamite has never been deciphered, we cannot say what was being counted or for whom; only the numbers themselves, and the ledger-like structure, are legible today.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine(Heading/rubric:) M325~d M388 [x] M057~b M387 M218 — 2 (units, N01) [...] M388(?) M347 M371 — 1 (unit, N01) M066 [x] M218 — 1 (unit, N01) [two illegible signs] — [quantity lost] M242~n M386~a M240~e(?) M096 — 1 (unit, N01) [...] — 2 (units, N01) (Subscript/final entry:) M291 M371 (Note: proto-Elamite remains undeciphered; the sign sequences designate commodities, persons, or institutions whose identities cannot yet be read. Only the numerals — here counts in the basic unit N01 — can be interpreted with confidence.)
Our translation engine — Fable 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo5 uncertain terms ↓
- M325~d — Proto-cuneiform sign, function unknown; the '~d' allograph designation indicates a variant form. Cannot verify from photo.
- M388 x M057~b — A compound or ligature sign. The '×' notation means M057~b is inscribed inside M388. Meaning unknown; may designate a commodity category.
- M387, M347, M371, M066, M242~n, M386~a, M240~e, M096, M291 — All are proto-cuneiform sign identifiers from the MDP/CDLI sign list for Susa-period tablets. Their lexical or administrative meanings are largely undeciphered; they may denote commodities, institutions, or personnel categories.
- M218 — Glossary identifies this as a possible subtotal or section-divider sign; the precise function is inferred from parallels, not independently confirmed for this tablet.
- N01 — The basic unit-impression numeral in proto-cuneiform counting. What commodity or measure it quantifies here is not determinable from surviving signs.
Reasoning ↓
The photograph shows a heavily fragmented tablet reassembled from several pieces (museum number Sb 22590, visible on adhesive labels in the lower portion of the image). The obverse surface, visible in the upper composite group, preserves impressed cuneiform wedges in multiple rows divided by a clear vertical ruling line, consistent with a tabular proto-cuneiform administrative format. Individual signs are difficult to resolve at this resolution — surface erosion, cracking across the clay, and the pieced-together condition all reduce legibility. The tallying marks (the round N01 impressions) are the most readily identifiable features: I can make out clusters of one or two round impressions to the right of sign-groups in several rows, consistent with the transliteration's 1(N01) and 2(N01) values. The reverse (lower fragment group) appears largely blank or too abraded to read, which is normal for tablets of this type. The transliteration is provided by project scholars using the MDP 17 corpus conventions; I cannot independently verify the specific M-number sign identifications from the photo alone, as the resolution does not permit sign-by-sign confirmation. No standard anglicised personal or royal names are present — this predates named royal authorship in the epigraphic record at Susa. The sign readings are treated as experimental because proto-cuneiform from Susa (proto-Elamite interface zone) remains only partially deciphered and the photo confirms damage but not individual sign forms.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 15, 2026 · 1651 in / 1027 out tokens
Transliteration
M325~d , M388 x M057~b M387 M218 , 2(N01)# [...] M388#? M347 M371 , 1(N01) M066# x M218 , 1(N01) x x , [...] M242~n# M386~a M240~e#? M096 , 1(N01)# [...] , 2(N01)# M291 M371
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Proto-Elamite (ca. 3100-2900 BC)) — MDP 17, 446. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).
Attribution
Image: Louvre Museum, Paris, France (P008644) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-fable-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
A window into the world's first total state. The Ur III administration tracked every animal, every worker, every shekel — for a population in the millions. The level of paperwork was not exceeded until the modern era.