Sumerian·Book

Position in chronology

MDP 17, 359

~3000 BCE·Uruk Period·P008557

About this tablet

A badly broken proto-Elamite accounting tablet from Susa in southwestern Iran, written around 3100 BCE in a script that has never been deciphered. It belongs to the world's earliest bureaucratic record-keeping: surviving traces show undeciphered commodity or category signs paired with numerical notations in the fractional counting systems used for grain or rationed goods. Too fragmentary to reconstruct any specific transaction, but an authentic piece of the administrative paperwork of one of the first urban societies.

Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.

Written in modern English

Only scraps of this ledger survive. One line lists an entry under two category signs we cannot read; another records a quantity of 3 in a fractional measure; a third names three commodity or qualifier signs whose meaning is lost. The next line is illegible. After that comes a quantity of 1 plus 1 in two small fractional units, and a final line whose number is broken away. Most of the tablet is simply gone.

A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.

Translation — our engine

Our engine
Low confidence
Obverse [...] , [...] M305 M388 [...] , [...] [...] , 3 (N39B) M297 M218 M329 [...] , [...] [...] [...] [...] , [...] [...] , [...] 1 (N30C) 1 (N30D) [...] , n (number lost)

Our translation engine — Fable 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.

Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.

Engine notes

read from photo
8 uncertain terms
  • M305Proto-cuneiform/proto-Elamite pictographic sign; commodity or object designation not independently confirmed; value inferred from parallel administrative tablets.
  • M388Proto-cuneiform/proto-Elamite sign; precise commodity reference uncertain; sign list identification depends on comparative corpus.
  • M297Proto-cuneiform/proto-Elamite sign; administrative function unclear without full context; possibly a commodity or institutional classifier.
  • M218Glossary flags this as possibly a subtotal or section-divider sign; its precise administrative function inferred from parallels only.
  • M329Proto-cuneiform/proto-Elamite sign; commodity or category designation uncertain; heavily damaged in the transliteration (marked with #).
  • N39BElongated impressed numeral; glossary notes its exact commodity-specific metrological value is debated — possibly area or capacity measure.
  • N30C / N30DNumerical signs in the N30 series; exact metrological value depends on the commodity system in use, which is unclear from this fragment alone.
  • n (final line)Represents an unreadable or indeterminate sign or numeral in the transliteration; cannot be rendered in translation.
Reasoning ↓

The photograph shows several fragments of a small, roughly round clay tablet (museum number Sb 22513 visible on an edge label, confirming identity) along with what appear to be clay envelope or sealing fragments below. The upper group shows the main inscribed surface broken into at least two joining pieces, with additional edge views. The surface is heavily eroded and the lighting is raking, which helps reveal impressed signs but also shows significant surface abrasion. I can discern impressed circular and linear marks consistent with proto-Elamite or early proto-cuneiform numerical signs, including what appear to be circular and semi-circular impressed numerals, but individual sign identifications at this resolution and state of preservation cannot be confirmed beyond the general sign types. The lower fragments show deep circular impressed marks (possibly numerical tallies or commodity signs) on a separate piece labelled with museum numbers in white. The transliteration uses sign designations from the proto-cuneiform/proto-Elamite sign lists (M-series for commodity/pictographic signs, N-series for numerals), which is consistent with the Uruk period date and Susa provenance. No full lexical readings are possible for the M-series signs in this proto-writing stage; their values are inferred from context and parallels. The photo generally supports the description of a fragmentary, multi-piece tablet with numerical and commodity sign content, but individual sign-by-sign verification against the transliteration is not possible at this resolution.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 15, 2026 · 1666 in / 1001 out tokens

Transliteration

[...] ,
x M305# M388 x , [...]
[...] , 3(N39B)
M297 M218 M329# [...] , [...]
x x x , [...]
[...] , [...] 1(N30C)# 1(N30D)
[...] , n

Scholarly note

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Proto-Elamite (ca. 3100-2900 BC)) — MDP 17, 359. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

Attribution

Image: Louvre Museum, Paris, France (P008557) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-fable-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).

Related tablets

Related sources