All tablets.

UM 29-16-564

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 29-16-564. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 29-16-640

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 29-16-640. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 29-16-714

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 29-16-714. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 29-16-733

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 29-16-733. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 29-16-739

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 29-16-739. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 55-21-082

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 55-21-082. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 55-21-089

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 55-21-089. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 55-21-115

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 55-21-115. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 55-21-117

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 55-21-117. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 55-21-118

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 55-21-118. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UM 63-17-008

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UM 63-17-008. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

UT 1599-22

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UT 1599-22. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

WCMA 20.1.05

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — WCMA 20.1.05. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

YOS 15, 087

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — YOS 15, 087. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

ZA 092, 017

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — ZA 092, 017. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format).

JCS 28, 238 03

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — JCS 28, 238 03. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Lipit-Eštar y1 — Lipit-Eštar became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.

JCS 28, 239 04

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — JCS 28, 239 04. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Lipit-Eštar y1 — Lipit-Eštar became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.

JCS 28, 240 06

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — JCS 28, 240 06. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Lipit-Eštar y1 — Lipit-Eštar became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.

Code of Lipit-Ishtar

One of the earliest law codes after the Code of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100 BCE), and the closest direct predecessor of Hammurabi's better-known code. Lipit-Ishtar's code is written in Sumerian — by this period a learned tongue, no longer spoken in daily life — and uses monetary compensation for personal injury, in continuity with Ur-Nammu. The legal tradition is Sumerian; Hammurabi's later innovation is largely to translate it into Akkadian and add the lex talionis.

Law

UET 1, 0222

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — UET 1, 0222. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Lipit-Eštar y1 — Lipit-Eštar became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.

~1922 BCE·Old BabylonianEditorial

N 0406

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — N 0406. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Ur-Ninurta y2 — Year after: Ur-Ninurta became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.

~1922 BCE·Old BabylonianEditorial

OB Contracts, pl. A1 no. 1

Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — OB Contracts, pl. A1 no. 1. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Ur-Ninurta y2 — Year after: Ur-Ninurta became king based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.