Position in chronology
MS 1739/1
About this tablet
This small clay tablet is a barley receipt from a Sumerian administrative archive, likely dating to the late third or early second millennium BCE. It records that a man named Puzur-Haya received one royal gur of barley — valued at one and a quarter shekels of silver — from someone called Katar, with two witnesses confirming the transaction. A second, more damaged entry on the reverse appears to record a similar barley receipt from the same year. Tablets like this were the everyday paperwork of grain distribution and credit in ancient Mesopotamian institutions, dated by month and by a formulaic 'year name' commemorating a notable event — here, the fashioning of a throne for the god Enlil.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
Puzur-Haya took delivery of one royal-standard gur of barley, worth one and a quarter shekels of silver, handed over by Katar. Ur-dukuga and Puzur-Haya (again, or a namesake) witnessed the transaction. It was dated to an intercalary 'harvest' month, in the year that the throne of Enlil was made. On the other side of the tablet is a second, badly damaged entry recording what looks like another gur of barley changing hands, with a witness named Puzur-something, dated to the same intercalary month and the same year — but the rest of the details are lost to breaks in the clay.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine1 royal gur of barley, corresponding to 1 1/4 shekels of silver, from Katar — Puzur-Haya received (it). Witness: Ur-dukuga. Witness: Puzur-<Ha>ya. Month: 'extra month, Harvest' (intercalary). Year: 'the throne of Enlil was fashioned.' (second entry, reverse) 1 gur of barley [...] for/in the amount of [...] Witness: Puzur-[...] Month: 'extra month, Harv[est]' Year: 'the thro[ne ...']
Our translation engine — Sonnet 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo5 uncertain terms ↓
- mu ku3-babbar 1 gin2 igi-4-gal2 — Literally 'for (the price of) silver, 1 shekel, 1/4-fraction.' The igi-N-gal2 construction here likely means 1 shekel + 1/4 shekel (i.e. 1¼ shekels) or alternatively a price ratio of 1 shekel per 4 units; exact interpretation depends on whether this is a total price or an exchange rate.
- ki ka-tar-ta — 'From Katar' — 'Ka-tar' may be a personal name (the seller) or a toponym; both interpretations are possible in OB economic texts. Treated here as a personal name/source.
- iti diri sze-KIN-ku5 — An intercalary month: 'extra month of the harvest (Šekinkuₓ).' The KIN-ku5 reading is marked uncertain by the editor ('#?' in the transliteration) and the exact month name may vary by scribal tradition or city.
- mu gu-za en-lil2-la2 ba-dim2 — Year-name: 'year in which the throne of Enlil was fashioned.' This formula is attested in multiple OB archives but has not been definitively assigned to a single known king; it may belong to Samsu-iluna or a regional ruler.
- puzur4-<ha>-ia2 (second witness) — The editorial <ha> indicates a sign the scribe omitted (haplography); the name is the same as the buyer Puzur-Haya or a different individual with the same name — the superscript '2' vs. '3' in the transliteration suggests the editor treats them as distinct individuals.
Reasoning ↓
The photograph shows a small, well-preserved yellowish clay tablet photographed from six angles (obverse, reverse, top, bottom, and two sides). The obverse (center-left large image) and reverse (bottom large image) carry the main text in clearly impressed wedges with horizontal rulings dividing lines. The surface is in good condition with only minor surface abrasion; no major breaks are visible. From the photo I can confirm the presence of multiple horizontal lines of cuneiform text on both faces; individual signs are difficult to read at this resolution but the overall sign density and layout are consistent with the scholarly transliteration provided. The top image appears to show the upper edge with a few signs, and the two side images show edge text consistent with witnessing clauses wrapping around. The museum number 'MS 1739/1' is written in modern ink on the reverse, visible in the center-lower photo. The year-name 'gu-za en-lil2-la2 ba-dim2' ('the throne of Enlil was fashioned') is attested in the Old Babylonian period, tentatively associated with the reign of Samsu-iluna of Babylon or a contemporary ruler. The transliteration's '#' and '?' markers on lines 8–9 and the second transaction block (lines 10–14) indicate the scribe had difficulty reading partially damaged or unclear signs — the photo at this resolution cannot resolve those specific passages. The personal name 'Ka-tar' (ki ka-tar-ta, 'from Katar') is unusual and may be a geographic origin or a personal name used as a source designation; I treat it as a personal name here. The rate 'igi-4-gal2' (literally '1/4-eye/fraction') is a standard Old Babylonian way of expressing a fractional price ratio.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · prompt 2026-05-12/v4-interpretation · May 12, 2026 · 3547 in / 1281 out tokens
Transliteration
1(asz) sze gur lugal mu ku3-babbar 1(disz) gin2 igi-4(disz)-gal2 ki ka-tar-ta puzur4-ha-ia3 szu ba-ti igi ur-du6-ku3-ga igi puzur4-<ha>-ia2 iti diri# sze#-KIN#-ku5#? mu gu-za en-lil2-la2 ba-dim2 1(asz) sze# gur# [...] mu# [...] igi puzur4#-[x] iti diri sze#-[KIN-ku5] mu gu-[za ...]
Scholarly note
Catalogue entry from CDLI (Early Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1900 BC)) — MS 1739/1. No scholarly translation has been published; the transliteration is from the ATF (CDLI's Atf-Friendly format). [year-name] Dated to Ur-Nammu y14 — The throne of Enlil was fashioned based on canonical year-name formula in the transliteration.
Attribution
Image: Schøyen Collection, Oslo, Norway (P250480) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative. source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-sonnet-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
A window into the world's first total state. The Ur III administration tracked every animal, every worker, every shekel — for a population in the millions. The level of paperwork was not exceeded until the modern era.