Position in chronology
Šamši-Adad I 02
About this tablet
This is a royal building inscription of Šamšī-Adad I, the Amorite king who ruled Assyria in the early second millennium BCE. He records that he cleared away and rebuilt a temple of Ištar — the Emenuè, standing on the site of the famous Emašmaš sanctuary at Nineveh — pointing out that the older building there had been erected centuries before by Maništušu, a son of Sargon of Akkad, and had since fallen into ruin. The stone fragment photographed here, one of the excavated witnesses to the text, carries only a few large signs; the full wording is reconstructed from several such pieces. The interest lies in the king's historical memory: he names an Akkadian ruler some five hundred years dead in order to place himself in a line of legitimate temple-builders.
Plain-language summary by the engine — meant as a doorway into the literal translation below.
Written in modern English
Šamšī-Adad, strong king, king of the world, chosen by Enlil, vice-regent of Aššur and beloved of Ištar, declares that he had the old structure stripped away — and mentions, in a passage now broken, the temple tower as well. The temple in question is the Emenuè, which stands on the ground of the Emašmaš. That earlier building had been put up by Maništušu, son of Sargon of Agade, and by Šamšī-Adad's day it had fallen into decay. What he did next was recorded in the following lines, but the stone breaks off there.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — our engine
Our engine(1) [...] ... (2) [I], (3) [Šam]šī-Adad (I), (4) [king] of the world, (5) I had it cleared away, and (6) [...] ... (7) and the ziqqu[rrat] (8) ... [...] (9) Šamšī-Adad (I), (10) strong (king), (11) king of the world, (12) appointee of the god Enlil, (13) vice-regent of the god Aššur, (14) beloved of the goddess Ištar: (15) (As for) the temple Emenuè, (16) which stands on the site of the Emašmaš, (17) the old temple (18) which Maništušu, (19) son of Sargon, (20) king of Agade, (21) had built — it had become dilapidated, and (22) the temple which … (the text breaks off here)
Our translation engine — Opus 5. Reads the photo, translates the cuneiform, and writes a plain-language interpretation. See methodology for limits.
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Engine notes
read from photo8 uncertain terms ↓
- ušassiksuma — Derived from nasāku, 'to drive out / expel / depose'; the subject and object of this clause are both broken; it may refer to Šamši-Adad expelling a rival or a squatter from the temple precinct. Some editions read this as referring to the clearing of the old building.
- zi-iq-qú-ur-ra-tam — Akkadian ziqqurratum, the temple-tower; restoration of the ending [-ra-tam] is supplied from parallel texts and is not fully preserved in all witnesses.
- bi-tum é-me-nu-è — The temple name Emenu-è is a Sumerian name meaning roughly 'house, (divine) abode of the exit/going-forth'; rendered here as a proper name following convention.
- é-maš-maš — The temple Ešmaš at Aššur, dedicated to Ištar; the spelling here is the Sumerian logographic form.
- ma-an-iš-ti-šu — Likely maništiāšu or related form meaning 'its former (builder/incumbent)'; the exact nuance — whether referring to the previous builder or the building's former condition — is debated.
- DUMU šar-ru-ki-in — Literally 'son of Sargon'; identified as Naram-Sin, son of Sargon of Akkad. The Akkadian šarru-kīn is the name conventionally anglicised as Sargon (here Sargon of Akkad / Sargon I).
- ša-ki-in dEN.LÍL — Royal epithet šākin Enlil, conventionally translated 'appointee of Enlil'; some translate 'governor/viceroy appointed by Enlil'.
- ÉNSI da-šur₄ — iššiakku ša Aššur, standard titulary rendered 'vice-regent of Aššur'; the sign da-šur₄ is the writing of the divine and city name Aššur.
Reasoning ↓
LAYER 1 — Visual examination: The fragment is a small, roughly triangular chip of dark stone (diorite or basalt), British Museum accession 99383. The inscribed face (top image) shows two ruled horizontal lines dividing the surface into at least two registers, each containing deep, sharply incised cuneiform wedges. The upper register appears to preserve three to four signs: at the left I can make out what looks like a large compound sign possibly including horizontal wedges consistent with LUGAL or a similar royal title sign; to its right there appear to be two further signs with prominent triangular heads. The lower register shows a sign group that could be consistent with an EN or NÍL component sign (stacked horizontals with angled head wedges), followed by further signs. Preservation of the carved wedges is relatively good where the stone surface is intact, but the extreme fragmentation means only a fraction of the original text survives on this face; the right and lower edges are all broken. The reverse (bottom image) is uninsribed and shows the raw break surface with the museum label. LAYER 2 — Translation from transliteration: The text is a royal building inscription of Šamši-Adad I (Old Babylonian period, c. 1813–1781 BCE). The transliteration opens with a damaged first-person declaration, followed by the king's name and titles, then a narrative clause about expulsion (ušassiksuma), a fragmentary passage about the ziqqurat, and then a full titulary block. The core narrative records the renovation of the temple Emenu-è within the Ešmaš temple precinct at Aššur, noting that the old temple had fallen into ruin; it had originally been built by the son of Sargon (i.e., Naram-Sin) king of Akkad. CROSS-CHECK: The photo preserves only a tiny portion of the full composite text; the signs visible — what appears to be LUGAL and an EN-type sign — are consistent with the titulary section (LUGAL KIŠ / ša-ki-in dEN.LÍL). I cannot verify specific signs for the personal name, the ziqqurat passage, or the Naram-Sin reference from this photo alone. The inscription is well known from other manuscript witnesses and the transliteration follows standard Šamši-Adad I building inscription tradition (cf. RIMA 1 A.0.39.2; Grayson, Assyrian Rulers of the Third and Second Millennia, pp. 49–51).
Generated by Claude Sonnet 4.6 · prompt 2026-05-11/v3-conventions · May 11, 2026 · 3243 in / 1393 out tokens
Why it matters
Claims the Emašmaš temple in Nineveh as a restoration of a structure built by Maništušu of Agade, asserting Assyrian dynastic continuity across seven generations of post-Akkadian history.
Transliteration
[...] x / [a]-na-[ku] / [dUTU]-⸢ši-dIŠKUR⸣ / [LUGAL] ⸢KIŠ⸣ / [ú]-⸢ša-as⸣-sí-ik-šu-⸢ma⸣ / [(x)] x meš sar x / ⸢ù⸣ zi-iq-qú-⸢ur⸣-[ra-tam] / x (x) [...] / ⸢dUTU-ši-d⸣IŠKUR / da-núm / LUGAL KIŠ / ša-ki-in dEN.LÍL / ÉNSI da-šur₄ / na-ra-am dINANNA / bi-tum é-me-nu-è / ša i-na qa-qar é-maš-maš / bi-tim la-bi-ri / ša ma-an-iš-ti-šu / DUMU šar-ru-ki-in / LUGAL a-ga-dè.KI / i-pu-šu i-na-aḫ-ma / bi-tam ša…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of an Assyrian king, published in the Royal Inscriptions of Assyria online project (RIAo). Translation reproduced from the ORACC edition. ORACC text Q005646.
Attribution
Image: BM 099333 (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) ? — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P465806). source
Translation excerpted from engine:claude-opus-5 (2026-07-12/v7-evolved).
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.