Position in chronology
Ashurbanipal 207
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 5(1') [...] ... [... de]scendant of Sennac[herib, k]ing of [Assyria; descendant of Sargo]n (II), king of [Assyria] — after the g[reat] gods [commanded] me [to ex]ercise rul[ers]h[ip] wit[h ...] (and) entrus[ted me with] the governing of the lands (and) the subjugating of enemies, kings of the east and west came and kissed [my feet]. (6') Taharqa, without (the consent of) the gods, made a serious attempt to take away Egypt for [...]. He scorned the [m]ight of (the god) Aššur, my lord, and trusted in [his] own strength. The harsh [d]eeds that the father who had engendered me had performed…
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 5 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Spotted an error? Suggest a correction — confirmed corrections feed the engine's knowledge base.
Why it matters
Preserves Ashurbanipal's justification for the Assyrian campaigns into Egypt, framing Taharqa's seizure of the Nile Delta as impious defiance of Aššur — a rare royal-inscription account of the 660s BCE Assyro-Egyptian conflict.
Transliteration
[x x] x x [...] / ⸢ŠÀ⸣.BAL.BAL md30-⸢PAP⸣.[MEŠ-SU] ⸢LUGAL⸣ KUR [aš-šur.KI ŠÀ.BAL.BAL mLUGAL-GI].⸢NA⸣ MAN KUR [aš-šur.KI] / ul-tu DINGIR.MEŠ ⸢GAL⸣.[MEŠ e?]-peš ⸢mal⸣-[ku]-⸢ú?⸣-[ti iq-bu-u?]-⸢in⸣-ni ⸢ina?⸣ [...]1 / KUR.KUR a-na šá-pa-⸢ri na⸣-ki-⸢ri a⸣-na kun-nu-ši ú-mal-⸢lu⸣-[ú ŠU.II-u-a] / LUGAL.MEŠ ⸢ṣi-it⸣ dUTU-ši u e-reb ⸢d⸣UTU-ši il-lik-ú-nim-ma ⸢ú⸣-na-áš-ši-⸢qu⸣ [GÌR.II-ia] / mtar-qu-ú ba-lu…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Ashurbanipal or a late Sargonid successor, edited by Jamie Novotny & Joshua Jeffers (RINAP 5, 2018–). ORACC text Q007615.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P393800). source
Translation excerpted from Novotny, J. & Jeffers, J. 2018–. The Royal Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC) and Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria. RINAP 5. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap5/Q007615/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.