CUSAS 35, 413

• sag-eš₃-tuku — Literally 'having/possessing the foremost quality'; an Early Dynastic administrative designation for prime-quality animals selected for institutional use or offerings. The exact institutional nuance (sacrificial selection vs. breeding stock vs. highest ration-grade) is debated.
• kir₁₁ — Usually interpreted as 'milk ewe' or a specific category of female sheep in Early Dynastic livestock rosters; the precise zoological or productive distinction from u₈ (ordinary ewe) is not fully established.
• bar-li — Literally 'stripped/clipped outside'; understood in this context as 'shorn' (wool removed), but the exact technical term and its relation to the wool-accounting system is uncertain. Some read it as a coat-quality descriptor rather than a processing action.
• de₅-de₅ — Reduplicated form of de₅, 'to collect/gather'; here functions as an administrative summary verb meaning animals have been received/collected into the account. The precise institutional transaction (from herder to temple? from temple to storehouse?) is not specified.
• kuruszda — Standard Early Dynastic term for fattened/stall-fed animals (lit. 'provided with fodder'); well-attested, but whether it marks an ongoing status or a completed fattening process in this entry is ambiguous.
• maš-da₃ — Normally translated 'gazelle'; its presence alongside sheep and lambs in an institutional livestock list is notable — gazelles were kept and fattened in some Early Dynastic temple herds, but the reading here is dependent on a partially damaged sign (ur₄ masz-da₃) and could alternatively refer to a category of young goat.
• ganun-maḫ — 'Great storehouse/granary'; a well-known Early Dynastic institutional building designation, but the surrounding context in the final line is broken and the precise administrative relationship to the preceding livestock entries is unclear.
• la₂ 3(disz@t) mu 7(disz@t) iti — Read as 'minus 3, year 7, month [x]'; the subtraction formula with la₂ is standard in Sumerian accounting, but the total from which 3 is subtracted is lost in the lacuna, and 'year 7' of which ruler or institution is unspecified.

The central (obverse) face is the clearest in the photograph: roughly 5–6 horizontal ruled lines are visible, each divided into a left and right column. Individual wedge clusters are discernible at the resolution provided. I can confirm the presence of multiple vertical and diagonal wedge groups consistent with numerical notations (the large curved signs for 10 and 20, and smaller diagonal wedges for units), and several complex logograms in the right-hand columns. The surface has a diagonal crack running upper-left to lower-right and some minor erosion, but most of the obverse is legible. The reverse (bottom image) shows sparser text — a few sign clusters in the upper-right area and what appear to be three vertical wedges (possibly '3') and a single diagonal below; these are consistent with the transliteration's final summary line. The edge views (left and right) show additional signs that I cannot resolve clearly enough to read independently. Overall the photo broadly supports the transliteration: the numerical patterns, the columnar layout, and the logogram clusters are where expected. However, several entries in the transliteration's damaged or uncertain lines (marked with # and [...]) cannot be verified from the photo alone. The reading 'la₂ 3(disz@t)' as '30 minus 3' (= 27) in the final line is a restoration dependent on the curved numeral form and a subtraction sign — plausible but not confirmable at this resolution. The transliteration is from CUSAS 35 (Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology), which provides the scholarly baseline used here.