Position in chronology
Esarhaddon 1013
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 4(1') [...] ... [...] before me the lordship of Assyria ... [...] his/its [...] was [...] ... did not exist and he was not mindful [...] king of the world, king of Assyria, governor of Babyl[on, ... (5′) ... th]at he established in all of the cult centers [...] my [...], the one who (re)built the akītu-house [...] (erasure) [...]. (8') [... it] was [on my mind] and [I] thought [about it ... lik]e a mountain, I built (and) completed [... (10′) ...] ... one [...] I built (its) brickwork and [...] of/which a king [...] made (them) work hard and in addition to ... [...] my [...] and as many of the gods (and) goddesses as ... [...] I carved ... [...] and strength[ened ...] magnificent cedar [beams], grown on Mount [Amanus ...] ... [...]
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 4 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Why it matters
Attests Esarhaddon's rebuilding of an akītu-house and assertion of dual kingship over Assyria and Babylon, linking cultic restoration to royal legitimacy in a period of deliberate reconciliation after his father Sennacherib's sack of Babylon.
Transliteration
[...] ú-x [...] / [...] ⸢el⸣-la-mu-u-a be-lut KUR aš-⸢šur.KI⸣ x [...] / [...]-šú ul ib-ši-ma ul iḫ-su-sa [...] / [...] x MAN ŠÚ MAN KUR aš-⸢šur⸣.KI GÌR.NÍTA KÁ.DINGIR.[RA.KI ...] / [...] ⸢ša⸣ ina kul-lat ma-ḫa-zi iš-tak-⸢ka⸣-[nu ...] / [...] x-ia e-piš É á-ki-ti [...] / [...] (erasure) [...] / [... ina uz-ni-ia ib]-ši-ma uš-ta-bi-⸢la⸣ [ka-bat-ti ...] / [... ki]-⸢ma⸣ šad-di-i ar-ṣip ú-šak-⸢lil⸣…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Esarhaddon, edited by Erle Leichty (RINAP 4, 2011). ORACC text Q003385.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P395568). source
Translation excerpted from Leichty, E. 2011. The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680–669 BC). RINAP 4. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap4/Q003385/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.