Position in chronology
Ashurbanipal 223
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 5Columns i and ii are not edited here iii 1´–35´ The inscription of Sennacherib and measurements and descriptions of Zarpanītu’s bed and Marduk’s throne are not edited here (iii 36') Wording (of the inscription) that was erased from the bed (and) the throne of the god Bēl (Marduk), which were deposited in the temple of (the god) Aššur, (and that of the inscription) written upon (them) in the name of Ashurbanipal. Simānu (III), the twenty-seventh day, eponymy of Awiānu (655) , th[ey were returned t]o Ba[byl]on [(...)]. (iv 1') [...] ... [...] ... [..., O l]ord, being furious (and) relenting,…
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 5 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Transliteration
da-ba-bu šá ina UGU GIŠ.NÁ šá ina UGU GIŠ.GU.ZA ša dEN / šá ina É AN.ŠÁR kar-rat-u-ni pa-áš-šu-ṭu-u-ni1 / MU šá mAN.ŠÁR-DÙ-A ina muḫ-ḫi šà-ṭir-u-ni / ITI.SIG₄ UD.⸢27⸣.KAM lim-mu ma-ú-ia-nu [a]-⸢na KÁ⸣.[DINGIR].⸢RA.KI⸣ / [(...)] ú-[ter-(ru)] / [...] x x [...] / [...] x I BAL ⸢LU?⸣ [...] / [...] ⸢be⸣-lum e-ze-zu nap-šú-⸢ru⸣ x [...] / [x (x)] ⸢ba⸣-nu-u šu-ud-du-u šu-šu-bu qa-tuk-⸢ka⸣ [ba-šu-u]2 /…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Ashurbanipal or a late Sargonid successor, edited by Jamie Novotny & Joshua Jeffers (RINAP 5, 2018–). ORACC text Q007631.
Attribution
Image: Created by Jamie Novotny and Joshua Jeffers, 2015-22. Lemmatized by Joshua Jeffers, 2018-22, for the NEH-funded RINAP Project at the University of Pennsylvania. The annotated edition is released under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license 3.0. Please cite this page as http://oracc.org/rinap/Q007631/..
Translation excerpted from Novotny, J. & Jeffers, J. 2018–. The Royal Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC) and Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria. RINAP 5. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap5/Q007631/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.