Position in chronology
Ashurbanipal 200
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 5(1) [For the goddess] Ištar, the exalted lady who resides in the city Ar[bela, ...] ..., who subjugates [...] Ashurbanipal, who(m) to/for ... [...], (whom) you gave the just scepter, which expands the land, (whom) you presented ... [...], (5) the one called by the goddess Dilbat (the planet Venus), the daughter of the god Enlil, the lady of [...], whom Ištar, the daughter of the god Sîn, [...] to subjugate [his] enemies [...]. (7) During the month Abu (V) — the month of the heliacal rising of the Bow Star, the festival of [the honored queen, the daughter of the god Enlil (the goddess Ištar)]…
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 5 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Why it matters
Links Ištar of Arbela's cult calendar to the heliacal rising of the Bow Star (Sirius) in month Abu, anchoring Sargonid royal legitimacy in observed astronomical phenomena.
Transliteration
[a-na d]⸢15⸣ GAŠAN ṣi-ir-ti a-ši-bat ⸢URU?.LÍMMU?⸣-[DINGIR ...] / [...] šá? A TA E? NU mu-šak-niš-at [...] / [x x (x)] maš-šur-DÙ-⸢A⸣ ša a-na ṣi-it LA Aʾ x [...] / ⸢ta⸣-ad-di-na ⸢GIŠ.GIDRU⸣ i-⸢šar-tú⸣ mu-rap-piš-at ⸢KUR? ta?-qí?-šá?⸣ x x (x) [...] / ni-bit ddil-⸢bat DUMU.MUNUS⸣ dEN.LÍL be-let [...] / šá d15 DUMU.MUNUS d30 a-na šuk-nu-še LÚ.KÚR.MEŠ-[šú? ...] / ina ITI.NE ITI na-an-mur-ti MUL.PAN…
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Ashurbanipal or a late Sargonid successor, edited by Jamie Novotny & Joshua Jeffers (RINAP 5, 2018–). ORACC text Q007608.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P394579). source
Translation excerpted from Novotny, J. & Jeffers, J. 2018–. The Royal Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC) and Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria. RINAP 5. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap5/Q007608/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.