Position in chronology
Ashurbanipal 085
Written in modern English
The opening lines are too damaged to read. What survives next describes Ummanigaš — also called Ḫumban-nikaš II — who had fled to the city of Susa; he was brought back inside and installed on the throne of Teumman, with chariots and wagons among the spoils or escort. One or two full columns are then lost entirely. On the reverse, the text picks up with a mention of Šamaš-šuma-ukīn, called a hostile brother, and someone taking the direct road, but the surrounding lines — including whatever an Elamite did or was commanded to do — are too broken to reconstruct.
A modern paraphrase of the literal translation — same content, contemporary voice.
Translation — scholar edition
RINAP 5(i 1') (No translation possible) (i 5') Um[manigaš (Ḫumban-nikaš II) ...] who had fl[ed ...] inside the city S[usa ...] I made h[im] enter [... I placed him] on the throne of Teu[mman ...] (With) the chariots, wagon[s, ...] One or two columns completely missing One or two columns completely missing (r i' 1) [... of Šamaš-šuma-ukīn, (my)] hostile brother, [...] took [the] direc[t road ...] until they ... [...] his command [...] (that) Elamite [...] ... [...]
Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period, volume 5 — scholar edition (ORACC).
Why it matters
Records Ashurbanipal's installation of Ummanigaš II on the Elamite throne after Teumman's defeat — a rare royal account of Assyrian-engineered regime change in Elam, corroborating the annals' narrative of the 653 BCE Ulai campaign.
Transliteration
x [...] / x [...] / ⸢it⸣-[...] / a-⸢na⸣ [...] / mum-[man-i-gaš ...] / ša ⸢in-nab⸣-[tu ...] / qé-reb URU.⸢šu⸣-[šá-an ...] / ú-še-rib-⸢šú?⸣ [...] / ina GIŠ.GU.ZA mte-⸢um⸣-[man ú-še-šib ...] / GIŠ.GIGIR.MEŠ GIŠ.ṣu-um-⸢bi⸣ [...] / ŠEŠ nak-⸢ri⸣ [...] / uš-te-eš-še-⸢ru⸣-[ni ḫar-ra-nu ...] / a-di šú-nu it-ti-[...] / e-peš pi-i-šú x [...] / LÚ.e-la-mu-⸢ú⸣ x [...] / ⸢ú⸣-x [...]
Scholarly note
Royal inscription of Ashurbanipal or a late Sargonid successor, edited by Jamie Novotny & Joshua Jeffers (RINAP 5, 2018–). ORACC text Q003784.
Attribution
Image: BM — (British Museum, London, UK) — from Nineveh (mod. Kuyunjik) — Photo via Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (cdli.earth/artifacts, P394588). source
Translation excerpted from Novotny, J. & Jeffers, J. 2018–. The Royal Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC) and Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria. RINAP 5. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/rinap5/Q003784/.
Related tablets
Related sources
One of the earliest specimens of human writing. Not literature, not law — accounting. The need to keep track of grain in a temple bureaucracy is what pushed marks-on-clay into a system that could one day carry epics.
Marks the boundary between proto-writing and writing. We can see signs being used systematically — but not yet phonetically. The leap to recording speech itself comes a few centuries later.
The earliest historical document in human history. Before this, we have lists, accounts, and dedications. Here, for the first time, a ruler tells us what happened — with names, places, and consequences.