SAA 04 085. Fragment Similar to No. 84 [military and political]

• ki-i EN—MU.MU NE-i — Standard oracle-query formula: 'whether, as lord-of-the-name-of-the-born'; the precise theological nuance of EN—MU.MU (bēl šum alidi, 'lord of the birth-name'?) remains debated. Starr renders it as a fixed expression addressing Šamaš in his role as destiny-determiner at birth.
• ina ⸢x⸣-ma? UD-MEŠ ⸢MI⸣-MEŠ — The intermediate sign(s) between ina and UD-MEŠ are broken/uncertain; 'dark days' (UD-MEŠ MI-MEŠ) is a standard idiom for inauspicious or ominous days in Assyrian divination texts.
• ši-kin a-dan-ni — Restoration 'the appointed time being set' — adan/adannu = fixed term, deadline; restored from parallel queries in SAA 04.
• KASKAL.2 i-ṣab-ba-tú-ma — KASKAL.2 = urḫa (road/route, dual or plural form); i-ṣab-ba-tú-ma = they will seize/take (the road). The subject is presumably the army or its commanders.
• KUR.mu-uṣ-ri — Egypt (Muṣur/Miṣir); the campaign to Egypt is consistent with Esarhaddon's known military activity, especially his 671 BCE campaign.
• an-na GI.NA UZU-MEŠ ta-mit SIG₅-MEŠ GI-MEŠ — Technical extispicy formula: 'a reliable yes, favourable omens, a favourable extispicy (lit. 'reading of the flesh')'; GI.NA = kīnu (reliable/true); ta-mit = tāmītu, oracular query or extispicy result; SIG₅ = ṭābu (good/favourable).

LAYER 1 — VISUAL READING: The obverse of the tablet (upper panel) shows a fragment roughly 5–6 cm across (scale bar confirms). The surface is heavily eroded, reddish-brown fired clay. Multiple horizontal lines of cuneiform wedges are visible but severely abraded; individual sign clusters can be made out in the upper two-thirds of the face, becoming almost illegible toward the lower margin. The ink accession number '81 / 2-4 / 346' is stencilled in the centre of the obverse — consistent with British Museum accessioning for the 1881 Kuyunjik purchase (BM 81-2-4, 346). The reverse (large lower panel) shows only a badly pitted, featureless surface with no legible signs. LAYER 2 — TRANSLITERATION: The text belongs to the well-known Esarhaddon oracle-query corpus (SAA 04 type); the standard formulae for solar divination — address to Šamaš, the name formula, the time-frame query, road/campaign question, and the closing sheep-entrail petition — are all recognisable. The name mdaš-šur—ŠEŠ—SUM-na = Aššur-aḫa-iddina = Esarhaddon is restored in brackets by the editor. CROSS-CHECK: At the image resolution available I can confirm the presence of multiple cuneiform lines on the obverse and the general block-script appearance consistent with Neo-Assyrian ductus, but individual signs are too abraded and the photo too small to verify specific readings against the transliteration. The reverse is completely unreadable from the photo. No discrepancies can be flagged because verification is not possible; the transliteration is accepted on editorial authority. Compare SAA 04 084 and the parallel oracle-inquiry texts discussed in Starr 1990, SAA 04 introduction.